Mill’S Two Proofs For The Ultimate Norm Of Morality . In

Mill’s two proofs for the ultimate norm of morality In his argument about the ultimate norm of morality, Mill claims that the utilitarian must claim that happiness happens to be the one and only thing that is desirable in itself. He also claims that the only proof of desirability is desire and goes ahead to give an argument that happiness happens to be the one and only thing that should be desired (Selling, 2016). Most importantly, Mill argues that an individual does desire his own happiness for its personal reasons and that makes happiness to be desired by and becomes desirable for its own sake as well as for humanity as a whole. Additionally, Mill goes ahead and tries to defend his postulation that happiness happens to be the only thing†¦show more content†¦From the proofs given by Mill, it can be easily seen that utilitarianism happens to be true if happiness happens to be the one and only thing desirable for its own sake and not for the sake of any other thing (Sullivan, n.d). Additionally, Mill states that the only proof of desirability is desire and every individual happens to desire his or her own happiness for its sake and not for the sake of any other thing. The other important point to note from the proofs is that, happiness is always needed for its own sake from the humanity point of view. It is important to note that happiness is always desirable for its own sake and happiness happens to be the only thing desires for its own sake (West, n.d). Other things like health, virtue, money, music, and power can always come to be desired for their own sakes but they are always desired as parts of happiness. The proofs also show that prudence us partial and as a result of it being partial, it always aims at the agent’s own happiness (Sullivan, n.d). On the other hand, the proofs indicate that morality by contrast happens to be impartial and as a result of it being impartial, it always aims at happiness as such. Additionally, if the moral point of view aims at personal happiness, then it happens to be the moral duty of each individual to promote happiness. As such, it is important to note that from the proof, happinessShow MoreRelatedUtilitarianism Vs. Utilitarianism By John Stuart Mill2839 Words   |  12 Pagesactions are governed by systems of morality, and our actions all define our society. A society is constructed of moral values, actions, and laws; hence these aspects all strive to make it a stable one. In order to cr eate peace and harmony, it is crucial that we do good deeds and perform ethical actions. However, what defines goodness? When is it that our actions deem ethical in terms of pleasure and happiness? Two important historical figures have provided two sets of ethical theories, a concreteRead MorePolygamy : Human Rights And Civil Liberties3424 Words   |  14 PagesMacRae, Paetsch, 2005). In light of the foregoing, this paper will evaluate the polygamy legislation in Canada for consistency (or lack thereof) with the Constitution. Acknowledging the complexity of the polygamy debate, this paper will borrow from two competing human rights perspectives — universalist and cultural-relativist perspectives. The former is predicated on individual rights, with a greater focus on civil and political rights, and the latter is predicated on collective rights such as culturalRead MoreOrganisational Theory230255 Words   |  922 Pagesto the future? Neo-modernist organization theory: putting people first? Neo-modernist organization theory: surfing the new wave? Postmodernist organization theory: new organizational forms for a new millennium? Postmodernism as a philosophy: the ultimate challenge to organization theory? Reflective organization theory: symbols, meanings and interpretations Reflexive organization theory: critical theory and psychoanalysis The evolution of management as reflected through the lens of modernist organization